The current liquid crystal industry is in a stage of rapid development. The panel, which accounts for the largest proportion of display costs, has hardly changed in these years. All kinds of tall and new concepts and new functions are all on the body. The panel is the most important component of the display. The color adjustment of the good panel teaches you. To create a good LCD, a good panel is the foundation and foundation.
Who is the better type of LCD panel? Talking about the classification of TFT technology
The panel is the foundation of the display. The current mainstream panel types include IPS, PLS, MVA, TN, etc., and each category will be further subdivided. The current OLED is rapidly rising, but it has not yet reached the level of full popularity, so the panel analysis this time focuses on the type of LCD panel, and does not elaborate on OLED.
The current mainstream panel types include IPS, PLS, MVA, TN, etc.
Current Japanese and Korean LCD panel manufacturers include JDI, Sharp, Samsung Display, and LG Display. Taiwanese LCD panel manufacturers include AUO, Chi Mei, Chunghwa Picture Tubes, HannStar Display, and domestic LCD panel manufacturers include BOE, Huaxing, and CLP Panda. The products are roughly classified into a few categories, namely IPS, PLS, MVA, TN, etc.
The first is IPS. IPS technology can be self-contained in the twisting direction of the liquid crystal molecules. The liquid crystal molecules of IPS always remain parallel to the screen and twist in the plane, which can significantly improve the expressiveness and contrast of the picture and meet the requirements of wide viewing angle. At present, IPS has full market competitiveness.
The liquid crystal molecules of IPS always remain parallel to the screen
IPS can be divided into multiple levels. Generally speaking, AH-IPS and E-IPS, most IPS displays are usually E-IPS panels. The core principles of PLS and IPS are not much different. Compared with E-IPS, they are transparent. There is a significant improvement in the rate. This is also the choice for the poor when technology transfer is not feasible.
